Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Fendt F275GT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt F275GT
Tool Carrier
- power
- 70 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 20
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
FendtFendt F275GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT6571 hp
F275GT70 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; F275GT is in the 63rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +14 ci (+6%)GT65244 ci
F275GT230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; F275GT is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
F275GT4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; F275GT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F275GT higher · +4 (+25%)GT6516
F275GT20
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; F275GT is in the 86th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)F275GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | GT65 | F275GT | — |
| Category | Utility | Tool Carrier | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | KHD | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F4L915H | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 70hp | ▲ GT65+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ F275GT+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 230ci | ▲ GT65+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ F275GT+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 188in | ▲ F275GT+36 in · +24% |
| Width | 76.7in | 74in | ▲ GT65+2.7 in · +4% |
| Height | 106in | 102in | ▲ GT65+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 8,201lb | ▲ F275GT+2,866 lb · +54% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 Volts | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Fendt F275GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 63rd percentile (70 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 86th percentile (20)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,201 lb)
A · GT65B · F275GTMedian Utility Tractor