Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs John Deere 410C
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 410C
Backhoe Loader
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 410C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 410C higher · +4 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
410C75 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 410C is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 410C higher · +32 ci (+13%)GT65244 ci
410C276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 410C is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
410C4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 410C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +12 (+300%)GT6516
410C4
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 410C is in the 4th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)410C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | John Deere | — |
| Model | GT65 | 410C | — |
| Category | Utility | Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4276D | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75hp | ▲ 410C+4 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 276ci | ▲ 410C+32 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 410C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 410C+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 281in | ▲ 410C+129 in · +85% |
| Width | 76.7in | 81.9in | ▲ 410C+5.2 in · +7% |
| Height | 106in | 104in | ▲ GT65+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 14,396lb | ▲ 410C+9,061 lb · +170% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 410C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS canopy | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,396 lb)
A · GT65B · 410CMedian Utility Tractor