Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs John Deere 5400
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5400
Utility
- power
- 68.4 hp
- displacement
- 179 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5400
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65 higher · +2.6 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
540068.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; 5400 is in the 62nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +65 ci (+36%)GT65244 ci
5400179 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; 5400 is in the 48th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT65 higher · +1 (+33%)GT654
54003
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; 5400 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +7 (+78%)GT6516
54009
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; 5400 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)5400 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | John Deere | — |
| Model | GT65 | 5400 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | John Deere 3029TAT01 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 68.4hp | ▲ GT65+2.6 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 5400+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 179ci | ▲ GT65+65 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 5400+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT65+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 132in | ▲ GT65+20 in · +15% |
| Width | 76.7in | 70.7in | ▲ GT65+6 in · +8% |
| Height | 106in | 90.9in | ▲ GT65+15.1 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 4,560lb | ▲ GT65+775 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 27/9.5-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,375lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | John Deere 5400 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 62nd percentile (68.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 48th percentile (179 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 44th percentile (4,560 lb)
A · GT65B · 5400Median Utility Tractor