Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs Kubota M4072
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M4072
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
KubotaKubota M4072
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M4072 higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
M407274 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; M4072 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +41 ci (+20%)GT65244 ci
M4072203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; M4072 is in the 56th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
M40724
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; M4072 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M4072 higher · +2 (+13%)GT6516
M407218
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; M4072 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)M4072 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Kubota | — |
| Model | GT65 | M4072 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3307 | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ M4072+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 203ci | ▲ GT65+41 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ GT65+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ M4072+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 146in | ▲ GT65+6 in · +4% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 102in | ▲ GT65+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | Kubota M4072 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 62nd percentile (146 in)
A · GT65B · M4072Median Utility Tractor