Image not recorded
AgcoModel A
Agco GT65A
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Agco GT65A vs Challenger MT325B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT325B
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AgcoAgco GT65A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT325B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT65A higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT65A71 hp
MT325B68 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65A is in the 64th percentile; MT325B is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65A higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT65A244 ci
MT325B201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65A is in the 69th percentile; MT325B is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65A higher · +8 (+67%)GT65A20
MT325B12
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65A is in the 86th percentile; MT325B is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT325B higher · +750 lb (+13%)GT65A5,864 lb
MT325B6,614 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT65A is in the 55th percentile; MT325B is in the 63rd · 5,107 models
GT65A (A)MT325B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Challenger | — |
| Model | GT65A | MT325B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Challenger | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 68hp | ▲ GT65A+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ GT65A+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT65A+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-Shuttle | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 148in | ▲ GT65A+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.8in | 76in | ▲ GT65A+0.8 in · +1% |
| Height | 107in | 105in | ▲ GT65A+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,864lb | 6,614lb | ▲ MT325B+750 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I/II | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco GT65A | Challenger MT325B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab, ROPS | Open (with ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 55th percentile (5,864 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 64th percentile (148 in)
A · GT65AB · MT325BMedian Utility Tractor