Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs Challenger MT335B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT335B
Utility
- power
- 78 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT335B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT75 higher · +5 hp (+6%)GT7583 hp
MT335B78 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; MT335B is in the 70th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT75 higher · +43 ci (+21%)GT75244 ci
MT335B201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; MT335B is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT75 higher · +1 (+33%)GT754
MT335B3
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; MT335B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT75 higher · +4 (+33%)GT7516
MT335B12
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; MT335B is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)MT335B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | GT75 | MT335B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Challenger | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 78hp | ▲ GT75+5 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ GT75+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ GT75+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ GT75+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ MT335B+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | 12-speed Synchronized Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 148in | ▲ GT75+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 76.4in | 76in | ▲ GT75+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 6,614lb | ▲ MT335B+1,103 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | I/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Either Cab or Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 70th percentile (78 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)
A · GT75B · MT335BMedian Utility Tractor