AGCOModel A
AGCO RT100
Row Crop
- power
- 128 hp
- displacement
- 408 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT100 vs McCormick Intl MTX125
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl MTX125
Row Crop
- power
- 130 hp
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO RT100
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MTX125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ MTX125 higher · +2 hp (+2%)RT100128 hp
MTX125130 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT100 is in the 44th percentile; MTX125 is in the 45th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT100 higher · +43 ci (+12%)RT100408 ci
MTX125365 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT100 is in the 57th percentile; MTX125 is in the 43rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1006
MTX1256
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT100 is in the 50th percentile; MTX125 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ RT100 higher · +3,035 lb (+25%)RT10015,055 lb
MTX12512,020 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
RT100 is in the 67th percentile; MTX125 is in the 49th · 1,350 models
RT100 (A)MTX125 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | RT100 | MTX125 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1006-60T | — |
| Power Output | 128hp | 130hp | ▲ MTX125+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 408ci | 365ci | ▲ RT100+43 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ RT100+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ RT100+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 203in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,055lb | 12,020lb | ▲ RT100+3,035 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT100 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 44th percentile (128 hp)B · 45th percentile (130 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 57th percentile (408 ci)B · 43rd percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 67th percentile (15,055 lb)B · 49th percentile (12,020 lb)
A · RT100B · MTX125Median Row Crop Tractor