Head to head · Agricultural

AGCO RT140 vs CaseIH Puma 170

AGCO RT140 Tractor
AGCOModel A

AGCO RT140

Agricultural

power
170 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full RT140 specs
AGCOAGCO RT140
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 1,028–1,028

Engine Power

▲ RT140 higher · +3 hp (+2%)
RT140170 hp
Puma 170167 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

RT140 is in the 74th percentile; Puma 170 is in the 73rd · 1,028 models

RT140 (A)Puma 170 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
ManufacturerAGCOCaseIH—
ModelRT140Puma 170—
CategoryAgriculturalRow Crop—

Engine

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
ManufacturerNot recordedFPT—
Power Output170hp167hp▲ RT140+3 hp · +2%
Rated RPMNot recorded2,200RPM—
CylindersNot recorded6—
DisplacementNot recorded411ci—
BoreNot recorded4.1in—
StrokeNot recorded5.2in—

Transmission

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
TypeNot recordedFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Operating WeightNot recorded18,740lb—

Hydraulics

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
System TypeNot recordedClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC)—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Hitch TypeNot recorded2/3N—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4 Wheel Drive (4WD)—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Electrical

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Emissions

SpecAGCO RT140CaseIH Puma 170Difference
Control SystemNot recordedSCR—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 74th percentile (170 hp)B · 73rd percentile (167 hp)
A · RT140B · Puma 170Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageAGCO RT140Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 170