Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST30x vs Challenger MT255B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST30x
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedST30x28.4 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST30x is in the 20th percentile; MT255B is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedST30x89.3 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST30x is in the 15th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST30x3
MT255B3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST30x is in the 23rd percentile; MT255B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT255B higher · +439 lb (+22%)ST30x1,984 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST30x is in the 12th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,107 models
ST30x (A)MT255B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | ST30x | MT255B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | E3CF | E3CF | Same |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 28.4hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 89.3ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 112in | ▲ ST30x+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 55.6in | 50.6in | ▲ ST30x+5 in · +10% |
| Height | 79.3in | 80.7in | ▲ MT255B+1.4 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 1,984lb | 2,423lb | ▲ MT255B+439 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,609lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | 1.5gal | ▲ ST30x+0.5 gal · +36% |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 12th percentile (1,984 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · ST30xB · MT255BMedian Utility Tractor