AGCOModel A
AGCO ST32
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST32 vs Challenger MT265
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO ST32
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedST3233 hp
MT26533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST32 is in the 25th percentile; MT265 is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedST3291.4 ci
MT26591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST32 is in the 18th percentile; MT265 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST323
MT2653
Median Utility Tractor4
ST32 is in the 23rd percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT265 higher · +399 lb (+15%)ST322,642 lb
MT2653,041 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST32 is in the 18th percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models
ST32 (A)MT265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | ST32 | MT265 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Power Output | 33hp | 33hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 91.4ci | Same |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 122in | ▲ MT265+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 51in | 60.6in | ▲ MT265+9.6 in · +19% |
| Height | 79.3in | 93.2in | ▲ MT265+13.9 in · +18% |
| Operating Weight | 2,642lb | 3,041lb | ▲ MT265+399 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,100lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Challenger MT265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,642 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 29th percentile (122 in)
A · ST32B · MT265Median Utility Tractor