ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT265 vs John Deere 4200
John DeereModel B
John Deere 4200
Utility
- power
- 26.3 hp
- displacement
- 73.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
ChallengerChallenger MT265
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT265 higher · +6.7 hp (+25%)MT26533 hp
420026.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT265 is in the 25th percentile; 4200 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT265 higher · +17.9 ci (+24%)MT26591.4 ci
420073.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT265 is in the 18th percentile; 4200 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2653
42003
Median Utility Tractor4
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; 4200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT265 higher · +7 (+78%)MT26516
42009
Median Utility Tractor12
MT265 is in the 73rd percentile; 4200 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
MT265 (A)4200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT265 | 4200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNE78A | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 26.3hp | ▲ MT265+6.7 hp · +25% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ 4200+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 73.5ci | ▲ MT265+17.9 ci · +24% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.1in | ▲ MT265+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 117in | ▲ MT265+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 60.6in | 53in | ▲ MT265+7.6 in · +14% |
| Height | 93.2in | 81in | ▲ MT265+12.2 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 3,041lb | 2,425lb | ▲ MT265+616 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,100lb | 2,198lb | ▲ 4200+98 lb · +5% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | John Deere 4200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 18th percentile (26.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 10th percentile (73.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,425 lb)
A · MT265B · 4200Median Utility Tractor