ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT265 vs New Holland TC35D
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TC35D
Utility
- power
- 35 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT265
vs
New HollandNew Holland TC35D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TC35D higher · +2 hp (+6%)MT26533 hp
TC35D35 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT265 is in the 25th percentile; TC35D is in the 28th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TC35D higher · +9.6 ci (+11%)MT26591.4 ci
TC35D101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT265 is in the 18th percentile; TC35D is in the 24th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2653
TC35D3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; TC35D is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ TC35D higher · +211 lb (+7%)MT2653,041 lb
TC35D3,252 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; TC35D is in the 26th · 5,107 models
MT265 (A)TC35D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT265 | TC35D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 35hp | ▲ TC35D+2 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 101ci | ▲ TC35D+9.6 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Dual Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 60.6in | 62.4in | ▲ TC35D+1.8 in · +3% |
| Height | 93.2in | 96in | ▲ TC35D+2.8 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 3,041lb | 3,252lb | ▲ TC35D+211 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,100lb | 2,025lb | ▲ MT265+75 lb · +4% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 28th percentile (35 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 24th percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,252 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 38th percentile (60.6 in)B · 42nd percentile (62.4 in)
A · MT265B · TC35DMedian Utility Tractor