Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST35 vs Cub Cadet Ex3200
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet Ex3200
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST35
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet Ex3200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST35 higher · +1 hp (+3%)ST3533 hp
Ex320032 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; Ex3200 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Ex3200 higher · +8.6 ci (+9%)ST3591.4 ci
Ex3200100 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST35 is in the 18th percentile; Ex3200 is in the 22nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST353
Ex32003
Median Utility Tractor4
ST35 is in the 23rd percentile; Ex3200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ ST35 higher · +618 lb (+24%)ST353,168 lb
Ex32002,550 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; Ex3200 is in the 17th · 5,107 models
ST35 (A)Ex3200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | ST35 | Ex3200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E3CD | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 32hp | ▲ ST35+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 100ci | ▲ Ex3200+8.6 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.5in | ▲ Ex3200+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ Ex3200+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 110in | ▲ ST35+12 in · +11% |
| Width | 56.3in | 59.1in | ▲ Ex3200+2.8 in · +5% |
| Height | 93.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,168lb | 2,550lb | ▲ ST35+618 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO: 540, Mid PTO: SAE 15 1.0 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | 1.2gal | ▲ ST35+0.5 gal · +42% |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Cub Cadet Ex3200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 22nd percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,168 lb)B · 17th percentile (2,550 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (122 in)B · 16th percentile (110 in)
A · ST35B · Ex3200Median Utility Tractor