Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST35 vs Yanmar F320
AGCOAGCO ST35
vs
YanmarYanmar F320
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST35 higher · +1 hp (+3%)ST3533 hp
F32032 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST35 is in the 25th percentile; F320 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST35 higher · +0.1 ci (<1%)ST3591.4 ci
F32091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST35 is in the 18th percentile; F320 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST353
F3203
Median Utility Tractor4
ST35 is in the 23rd percentile; F320 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ ST35 higher · +7 (+78%)ST3516
F3209
Median Utility Tractor12
ST35 is in the 73rd percentile; F320 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
ST35 (A)F320 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ST35 | F320 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E3CD | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 32hp | ▲ ST35+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 91.3ci | ▲ ST35+0.1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ ST35+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ F320+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 129in | ▲ F320+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 56.3in | 57.3in | ▲ F320+1 in · +2% |
| Height | 93.5in | 91.9in | ▲ ST35+1.6 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,168lb | 2,977lb | ▲ ST35+191 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO: 540, Mid PTO: SAE 15 1.0 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Rear Type I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST35 | Yanmar F320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,168 lb)B · 22nd percentile (2,977 lb)
A · ST35B · F320Median Utility Tractor