AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-160
Tractor
- power
- 161 hp
- displacement
- 409 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
Agrinar T-160 vs CaseIH Puma 160
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 160
Row Crop
- power
- 160 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AgrinarAgrinar T-160
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 160
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T-160 higher · +1 hp (<1%)T-160161 hp
Puma 160160 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
T-160 is in the 63rd percentile; Puma 160 is in the 62nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 160 higher · +2 ci (<1%)T-160409 ci
Puma 160411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
T-160 is in the 57th percentile; Puma 160 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedT-1606
Puma 1606
Median Row Crop Tractor6
T-160 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 160 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 160 higher · +6 (+50%)T-16012
Puma 16018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
T-160 is in the 27th percentile; Puma 160 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
T-160 (A)Puma 160 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | CaseIH | — |
| Model | T-160 | Puma 160 | — |
| Category | Not recorded | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | FPT | — |
| Model | N67 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 161hp | 160hp | ▲ T-160+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ T-160+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 409ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 160+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,450lb | 16,360lb | ▲ Puma 160+2,910 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-160 | CaseIH Puma 160 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 63rd percentile (161 hp)B · 62nd percentile (160 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 57th percentile (409 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 59th percentile (13,450 lb)B · 71st percentile (16,360 lb)
A · T-160B · Puma 160Median Row Crop Tractor