CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 160
Row Crop
- power
- 160 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl XTX185
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl XTX185
Row Crop
- power
- 162 hp
- displacement
- 409 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 160
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl XTX185
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ XTX185 higher · +2 hp (+1%)Puma 160160 hp
XTX185162 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 160 is in the 62nd percentile; XTX185 is in the 63rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 160 higher · +2 ci (<1%)Puma 160411 ci
XTX185409 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 160 is in the 60th percentile; XTX185 is in the 57th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1606
XTX1856
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 160 is in the 50th percentile; XTX185 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ XTX185 higher · +14 (+78%)Puma 16018
XTX18532
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 160 is in the 61st percentile; XTX185 is in the 91st · 1,200 models
Puma 160 (A)XTX185 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Puma 160 | XTX185 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 160hp | 162hp | ▲ XTX185+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 409ci | ▲ Puma 160+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | XtraSpeed powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 209in | — |
| Width | 61.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,360lb | 17,739lb | ▲ XTX185+1,379 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl XTX185 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 63rd percentile (162 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 57th percentile (409 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 71st percentile (16,360 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,739 lb)
A · Puma 160B · XTX185Median Row Crop Tractor