CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 160
Row Crop
- power
- 160 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl MTX165
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl MTX165
Row Crop
- power
- 160 hp
- displacement
- 412 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 160
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MTX165
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 160160 hp
MTX165160 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 160 is in the 62nd percentile; MTX165 is in the 62nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MTX165 higher · +1 ci (<1%)Puma 160411 ci
MTX165412 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 160 is in the 60th percentile; MTX165 is in the 64th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1606
MTX1656
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 160 is in the 50th percentile; MTX165 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ MTX165 higher · +14 (+78%)Puma 16018
MTX16532
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 160 is in the 61st percentile; MTX165 is in the 91st · 1,200 models
Puma 160 (A)MTX165 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Puma 160 | MTX165 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 160hp | 160hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 412ci | ▲ MTX165+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 206in | — |
| Width | 61.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,360lb | 16,185lb | ▲ Puma 160+175 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl MTX165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 62nd percentile (160 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 64th percentile (412 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 71st percentile (16,360 lb)B · 70th percentile (16,185 lb)
A · Puma 160B · MTX165Median Row Crop Tractor