AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-85
Utility
- power
- 80.9 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Agrinar T-85 vs Challenger MT335B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT335B
Utility
- power
- 78 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AgrinarAgrinar T-85
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT335B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T-85 higher · +2.9 hp (+4%)T-8580.9 hp
MT335B78 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T-85 is in the 72nd percentile; MT335B is in the 70th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T-85 higher · +43 ci (+21%)T-85244 ci
MT335B201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T-85 is in the 69th percentile; MT335B is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT335B higher · +3,614 lb (+120%)T-853,000 lb
MT335B6,614 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
T-85 is in the 23rd percentile; MT335B is in the 63rd · 5,107 models
T-85 (A)MT335B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | Challenger | — |
| Model | T-85 | MT335B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International | Challenger | — |
| Model | P4000 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 80.9hp | 78hp | ▲ T-85+2.9 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ T-85+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ T-85+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 12-speed Synchronized Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 148in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 76in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,000lb | 6,614lb | ▲ MT335B+3,614 lb · +120% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Challenger MT335B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Either Cab or Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (80.9 hp)B · 70th percentile (78 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)
A · T-85B · MT335BMedian Utility Tractor