Head to head · Row Crop

Allis Chalmers 175 vs Ford Commander 6000

Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A

Allis Chalmers 175

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
236 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
8
Full 175 specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford Commander 6000

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
242 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full Commander 6000 specs
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 175
vs
FordFord Commander 6000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +6 ci (+3%)
175236 ci
Commander 6000242 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

175 is in the 14th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 14th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +2 (+50%)
1754
Commander 60006
Median Row Crop Tractor6

175 is in the 17th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Commander 6000 higher · +2 (+25%)
1758
Commander 600010
Median Row Crop Tractor16

175 is in the 16th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models

Operating Weight

▲ 175 higher · +700 lb (+10%)
1757,830 lb
Commander 60007,130 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

175 is in the 20th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 16th · 1,350 models

175 (A)Commander 6000 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerAllis ChalmersFord—
Model175Commander 6000—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
ManufacturerPerkinsFord—
ModelPerkins 4.236Not recorded—
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,430RPM▲ Commander 6000+430 RPM · +22%
Cylinders46▲ Commander 6000+2 · +50%
Displacement236ci242ci▲ Commander 6000+6 ci · +3%
Bore3.9in3.6in▲ 175+0.3 in · +8%
Stroke5in3.9in▲ 175+1.1 in · +28%

Transmission

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypePartial power shiftFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Length137in142in▲ Commander 6000+5 in · +4%
Width76.6in71.5in▲ 175+5.1 in · +7%
Height59.8in78.2in▲ Commander 6000+18.4 in · +31%
Operating Weight7,830lb7,130lb▲ 175+700 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeLiveIndependent—
Speed 1540rpm540rpmSame
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Tires

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Rear Tire Size28Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIIII/I—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—
Brake TypeDifferential mechanical band and discDifferential hydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
Coolant3.8gal3.9gal▲ Commander 6000+0.1 gal · +3%

Operator Station

SpecAllis Chalmers 175Ford Commander 6000Difference
TypeOpenOpen operator station—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 14th percentile (236 ci)B · 14th percentile (242 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 17th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 16th percentile (8)B · 22nd percentile (10)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 20th percentile (7,830 lb)B · 16th percentile (7,130 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 10th percentile (137 in)B · 13th percentile (142 in)
A · 175B · Commander 6000Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageAllis Chalmers 175Full spec pageFord Commander 6000