Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Mitsubishi MT25
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT25
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied502025 hp
MT2525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; MT25 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Operating Weight
▲ 5020 higher · +241 lb (+13%)50202,060 lb
MT251,819 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
5020 is in the 13th percentile; MT25 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT25 higher · +10.1 in (+10%)502098.9 in
MT25109 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
5020 is in the 8th percentile; MT25 is in the 15th · 4,659 models
Width
▲ MT25 higher · +6.3 in (+13%)502048 in
MT2554.3 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
5020 is in the 14th percentile; MT25 is in the 25th · 3,933 models
5020 (A)MT25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 5020 | MT25 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | S126 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.1in | ▲ 5020+0.5 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.6in | ▲ 5020+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 109in | ▲ MT25+10.1 in · +10% |
| Width | 48in | 54.3in | ▲ MT25+6.3 in · +13% |
| Height | 75.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 1,819lb | ▲ 5020+241 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Mitsubishi MT25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,819 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (98.9 in)B · 15th percentile (109 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 14th percentile (48 in)B · 25th percentile (54.3 in)
A · 5020B · MT25Median Utility Tractor