Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5020
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5020 vs Yanmar FX255
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FX255
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 18
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5020
vs
YanmarYanmar FX255
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5020 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)502025 hp
FX25524.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 16th percentile; FX255 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FX255 higher · +12.2 ci (+16%)502077.1 ci
FX25589.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 11th percentile; FX255 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FX255 higher · +1 (+50%)50202
FX2553
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 3rd percentile; FX255 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FX255 higher · +10 (+125%)50208
FX25518
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; FX255 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
5020 (A)FX255 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 5020 | FX255 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Yanmar | — |
| Model | S126 | 3TNB84 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.7hp | ▲ 5020+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ FX255+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 89.3ci | ▲ FX255+12.2 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.3in | ▲ 5020+0.3 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 3.5in | ▲ 5020+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Partial Power Shift, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 98.9in | 112in | ▲ FX255+13.1 in · +13% |
| Width | 48in | 52in | ▲ FX255+4 in · +8% |
| Height | 75.6in | 59.1in | ▲ 5020+16.5 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 2,370lb | ▲ FX255+310 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, Transmission PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | JIS1 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum and shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5020 | Yanmar FX255 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,370 lb)
A · 5020B · FX255Median Utility Tractor