Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5050
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 168 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5050 vs Ford 2000
Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5050
vs
FordFord 2000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5050 higher · +1.6 hp (+3%)505050 hp
200048.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5050 is in the 45th percentile; 2000 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5050 higher · +34 ci (+25%)5050168 ci
2000134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5050 is in the 45th percentile; 2000 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2000 higher · +1 (+33%)50503
20004
Median Utility Tractor4
5050 is in the 23rd percentile; 2000 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5050 higher · +4 (+100%)50508
20004
Median Utility Tractor12
5050 is in the 23rd percentile; 2000 is in the 4th · 4,941 models
5050 (A)2000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ford | — |
| Model | 5050 | 2000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Ford | — |
| Model | Fiat | Ford 2.2L 4-cyl gasoline | — |
| Power Output | 50hp | 48.4hp | ▲ 5050+1.6 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 5050+500 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 2000+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 168ci | 134ci | ▲ 5050+34 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.4in | ▲ 5050+0.7 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 5050+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 114in | ▲ 5050+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 67in | 87.5in | ▲ 2000+20.5 in · +31% |
| Height | 59.3in | 57in | ▲ 5050+2.3 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 4,410lb | 3,020lb | ▲ 5050+1,390 lb · +46% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 7.50-16 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,197lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical contracting band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.6gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 2000+0.2 gal · +6% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Ford 2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 45th percentile (50 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 45th percentile (168 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,410 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,020 lb)
A · 5050B · 2000Median Utility Tractor