Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 2000 vs TYM T474
FordFord 2000
vs
TYMTYM T474
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2000 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)200048.4 hp
T47448.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2000 is in the 43rd percentile; T474 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T474 higher · +6 ci (+4%)2000134 ci
T474140 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2000 is in the 31st percentile; T474 is in the 35th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied20004
T4744
Median Utility Tractor4
2000 is in the 50th percentile; T474 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T474 higher · +8 (+200%)20004
T47412
Median Utility Tractor12
2000 is in the 4th percentile; T474 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
2000 (A)T474 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | TYM | — |
| Model | 2000 | T474 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kukje | — |
| Model | Ford 2.2L 4-cyl gasoline | A2300N4 | — |
| Power Output | 48.4hp | 48.3hp | ▲ 2000+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ T474+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 140ci | ▲ T474+6 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.5in | ▲ T474+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.7in | ▲ T474+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Shuttle and Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 114in | 131in | ▲ T474+17 in · +15% |
| Width | 87.5in | 54.5in | ▲ 2000+33 in · +61% |
| Height | 57in | 94.4in | ▲ T474+37.4 in · +66% |
| Operating Weight | 3,020lb | 3,230lb | ▲ T474+210 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 1.7gal | ▲ 2000+2.1 gal · +124% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 2000 | TYM T474 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (48.4 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 35th percentile (140 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,020 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,230 lb)
A · 2000B · T474Median Utility Tractor