Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 2000 vs New Holland T3030
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T3030
Sub-Compact
- power
- 46.9 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 2000
vs
New HollandNew Holland T3030
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2000 higher · +1.5 hp (+3%)200048.4 hp
T303046.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2000 is in the 43rd percentile; T3030 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied2000134 ci
T3030134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2000 is in the 31st percentile; T3030 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied20004
T30304
Median Utility Tractor4
2000 is in the 50th percentile; T3030 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T3030 higher · +12 (+300%)20004
T303016
Median Utility Tractor12
2000 is in the 4th percentile; T3030 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
2000 (A)T3030 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 2000 | T3030 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Ford 2.2L 4-cyl gasoline | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 48.4hp | 46.9hp | ▲ 2000+1.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ T3030+600 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 134ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 114in | 130in | ▲ T3030+16 in · +14% |
| Width | 87.5in | 54.3in | ▲ 2000+33.2 in · +61% |
| Height | 57in | 76in | ▲ T3030+19 in · +33% |
| Operating Weight | 3,020lb | 3,219lb | ▲ T3030+199 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type 1 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 2000 | New Holland T3030 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (48.4 hp)B · 41st percentile (46.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,020 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,219 lb)
A · 2000B · T3030Median Utility Tractor