Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 620
Utility
- power
- 19.5 hp
- displacement
- 49.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 620 vs Mitsubishi MT2000
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT2000
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 65.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 620
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT2000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT2000 higher · +0.5 hp (+3%)62019.5 hp
MT200020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
620 is in the 8th percentile; MT2000 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT2000 higher · +15.9 ci (+32%)62049.8 ci
MT200065.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
620 is in the 3rd percentile; MT2000 is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT2000 higher · +1 (+50%)6202
MT20003
Median Utility Tractor4
620 is in the 3rd percentile; MT2000 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT2000 higher · +518 lb (+35%)6201,499 lb
MT20002,017 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
620 is in the 6th percentile; MT2000 is in the 12th · 5,107 models
620 (A)MT2000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 620 | MT2000 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Onan | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CCKB | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19.5hp | 20hp | ▲ MT2000+0.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 620+1,100 RPM · +44% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT2000+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.8ci | 65.7ci | ▲ MT2000+15.9 ci · +32% |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 82.7in | 111in | ▲ MT2000+28.3 in · +34% |
| Width | 47.6in | 46.3in | ▲ 620+1.3 in · +3% |
| Height | 42.9in | 93.9in | ▲ MT2000+51 in · +119% |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | 2,017lb | ▲ MT2000+518 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00-12 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-16 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.5 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (49.8 ci)B · 8th percentile (65.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 6th percentile (1,499 lb)B · 12th percentile (2,017 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 3rd percentile (82.7 in)B · 17th percentile (111 in)
A · 620B · MT2000Median Utility Tractor