Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7195
Utility
- power
- 19 hp
- displacement
- 64.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7195 vs Mitsubishi MT2000
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT2000
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 65.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7195
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT2000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT2000 higher · +1 hp (+5%)719519 hp
MT200020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7195 is in the 7th percentile; MT2000 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT2000 higher · +1 ci (+2%)719564.7 ci
MT200065.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7195 is in the 7th percentile; MT2000 is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied71953
MT20003
Median Utility Tractor4
7195 is in the 23rd percentile; MT2000 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT2000 higher · +25 lb (+1%)71951,992 lb
MT20002,017 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
7195 is in the 12th percentile; MT2000 is in the 12th · 5,107 models
7195 (A)MT2000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 7195 | MT2000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi | Same |
| Model | K3E | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19hp | 20hp | ▲ MT2000+1 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 64.7ci | 65.7ci | ▲ MT2000+1 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 111in | ▲ MT2000+4 in · +4% |
| Width | 46.3in | 46.3in | Same |
| Height | 78.9in | 93.9in | ▲ MT2000+15 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 1,992lb | 2,017lb | ▲ MT2000+25 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00-12 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-16 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Mitsubishi MT2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 7th percentile (19 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 7th percentile (64.7 ci)B · 8th percentile (65.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 12th percentile (1,992 lb)B · 12th percentile (2,017 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (107 in)B · 17th percentile (111 in)
A · 7195B · MT2000Median Utility Tractor