Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers D10
Row Crop
- power
- 28.6 hp
- displacement
- 139 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers D10 vs Challenger MT255B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers D10
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ D10 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)D1028.6 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
D10 is in the 2nd percentile; MT255B is in the 2nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ D10 higher · +49.7 ci (+56%)D10139 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
D10 is in the 3rd percentile; MT255B is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ D10 higher · +1 (+33%)D104
MT255B3
Median Row Crop Tractor6
D10 is in the 17th percentile; MT255B is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ D10 higher · +277 lb (+11%)D102,700 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
D10 is in the 1st percentile; MT255B is in the 1st · 1,350 models
D10 (A)MT255B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Challenger | — |
| Model | D10 | MT255B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Iseki | — |
| Model | Power-Crater | E3CF | — |
| Power Output | 28.6hp | 28.4hp | ▲ D10+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT255B+850 RPM · +52% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ D10+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 139ci | 89.3ci | ▲ D10+49.7 ci · +56% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.3in | ▲ D10+0.6 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 112in | ▲ D10+9 in · +8% |
| Width | Not recorded | 50.6in | — |
| Height | 76in | 80.7in | ▲ MT255B+4.7 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 2,700lb | 2,423lb | ▲ D10+277 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Snap-Coupler | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,609lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Mechanical Shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | 1.5gal | ▲ D10+0.6 gal · +43% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | Challenger MT255B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 2nd percentile (28.6 hp)B · 2nd percentile (28.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 3rd percentile (139 ci)B · 1st percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 1st percentile (2,700 lb)B · 1st percentile (2,423 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 3rd percentile (121 in)B · 2nd percentile (112 in)
A · D10B · MT255BMedian Row Crop Tractor