Head to head · Utility

Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 vs McCormick Intl X50.30

Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 Tractor
Antonio CarraroModel A

Antonio Carraro TRG 10400

Utility

power
95 hp
displacement
181 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full TRG 10400 specs
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B

McCormick Intl X50.30

Utility

power
95 hp
displacement
208 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
32
Full X50.30 specs
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRG 10400
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
TRG 1040095 hp
X50.3095 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

TRG 10400 is in the 81st percentile; X50.30 is in the 81st · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ X50.30 higher · +27 ci (+15%)
TRG 10400181 ci
X50.30208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

TRG 10400 is in the 49th percentile; X50.30 is in the 58th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
TRG 104004
X50.304
Median Utility Tractor4

TRG 10400 is in the 50th percentile; X50.30 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ X50.30 higher · +16 (+100%)
TRG 1040016
X50.3032
Median Utility Tractor12

TRG 10400 is in the 73rd percentile; X50.30 is in the 97th · 4,941 models

TRG 10400 (A)X50.30 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
ManufacturerAntonio CarraroMcCormick Intl—
ModelTRG 10400X50.30—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
ManufacturerVM MotoriPerkins—
ModelD754854E-E34TA—
Power Output95hp95hpSame
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,200RPM▲ TRG 10400+400 RPM · +18%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement181ci208ci▲ X50.30+27 ci · +15%
Bore3.7in3.9in▲ X50.30+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke4.2in4.3in▲ X50.30+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
TypeNot recordedMechanical shuttle and power shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Length138in164in▲ X50.30+26 in · +19%
Width55.7in83in▲ X50.30+27.3 in · +49%
Height91.5in101in▲ X50.30+9.5 in · +10%
Operating Weight5,247lb8,030lb▲ X50.30+2,783 lb · +53%

Hydraulics

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Steering TypeHydraulic PowerHydrostatic power—

Tires

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Front Tire Size11.2R20Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size320/85R24Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedCategory II—
Hitch CategoryII/INot recorded—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydraulic PowerHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
Control SystemNot recordedEGR—

Operator Station

SpecAntonio Carraro TRG 10400McCormick Intl X50.30Difference
TypeNot recordedROPS/Cab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 97th percentile (32)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 50th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)
A · TRG 10400B · X50.30Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAntonio Carraro TRG 10400Full spec pageMcCormick Intl X50.30