Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 vs McCormick Intl X50.30m
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.30m
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRG 10400
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.30m
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedTRG 1040095 hp
X50.30m95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRG 10400 is in the 81st percentile; X50.30m is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X50.30m higher · +27 ci (+15%)TRG 10400181 ci
X50.30m208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRG 10400 is in the 49th percentile; X50.30m is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRG 104004
X50.30m4
Median Utility Tractor4
TRG 10400 is in the 50th percentile; X50.30m is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X50.30m higher · +8 (+50%)TRG 1040016
X50.30m24
Median Utility Tractor12
TRG 10400 is in the 73rd percentile; X50.30m is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
TRG 10400 (A)X50.30m (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | TRG 10400 | X50.30m | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | Perkins | — |
| Model | D754 | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 95hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TRG 10400+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 208ci | ▲ X50.30m+27 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.9in | ▲ X50.30m+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.3in | ▲ X50.30m+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 163in | ▲ X50.30m+25 in · +18% |
| Width | 55.7in | 81.2in | ▲ X50.30m+25.5 in · +46% |
| Height | 91.5in | 100in | ▲ X50.30m+8.5 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 7,326lb | ▲ X50.30m+2,079 lb · +40% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.2R20 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 320/85R24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | McCormick Intl X50.30m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 70th percentile (7,326 lb)
A · TRG 10400B · X50.30mMedian Utility Tractor