Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 vs Zetor 9020
ZetorModel B
Zetor 9020
Agricultural
- power
- 93 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRG 10400
vs
ZetorZetor 9020
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TRG 10400 higher · +2 hp (+2%)TRG 1040095 hp
902093 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRG 10400 is in the 81st percentile; 9020 is in the 80th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9020 higher · +73 ci (+40%)TRG 10400181 ci
9020254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRG 10400 is in the 49th percentile; 9020 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRG 104004
90204
Median Utility Tractor4
TRG 10400 is in the 50th percentile; 9020 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TRG 10400 higher · +4 (+33%)TRG 1040016
902012
Median Utility Tractor12
TRG 10400 is in the 73rd percentile; 9020 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
TRG 10400 (A)9020 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | Zetor | — |
| Model | TRG 10400 | 9020 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | Zetor | — |
| Model | D754 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 93hp | ▲ TRG 10400+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TRG 10400+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 254ci | ▲ 9020+73 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.1in | ▲ 9020+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.7in | ▲ 9020+0.5 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 152in | ▲ 9020+14 in · +10% |
| Width | 55.7in | 73in | ▲ 9020+17.3 in · +31% |
| Height | 91.5in | 105in | ▲ 9020+13.5 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 7,090lb | ▲ 9020+1,843 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.2R20 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 320/85R24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRG 10400 | Zetor 9020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 80th percentile (93 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 73rd percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 68th percentile (7,090 lb)
A · TRG 10400B · 9020Median Utility Tractor