Image not recorded
BaldwinModel A
Baldwin DM300
Articulated
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Articulated
Baldwin DM300 vs Challenger MT665C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665C
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BaldwinBaldwin DM300
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedDM300290 hp
MT665C290 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
DM300 is in the 4th percentile; MT665C is in the 5th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DM300 higher · +98 ci (+19%)DM300611 ci
MT665C513 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
DM300 is in the 9th percentile; MT665C is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDM3006
MT665C6
Median Articulated Tractor6
DM300 is in the 50th percentile; MT665C is in the 50th · 61 models
DM300 (A)MT665C (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Baldwin | Challenger | — |
| Model | DM300 | MT665C | — |
| Category | Articulated, Four-Wheel Drive | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | LTA-10A | 84CTA | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 290hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 513ci | ▲ DM300+98 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.4in | ▲ DM300+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 5.7in | ▲ MT665C+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 223in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 133in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 25,795lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 26,460lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Baldwin DM300 | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 4th percentile (290 hp)B · 5th percentile (290 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 9th percentile (611 ci)B · 1st percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · DM300B · MT665CMedian Articulated Tractor