Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1025 MIG
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1025 MIG vs CaseIH Farmall 115C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 115C
Row Crop
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 1025 MIG
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 115C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied1025 MIG115 hp
Farmall 115C115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1025 MIG is in the 88th percentile; Farmall 115C is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +83 ci (+40%)1025 MIG290 ci
Farmall 115C207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1025 MIG is in the 84th percentile; Farmall 115C is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1025 MIG4
Farmall 115C4
Median Utility Tractor4
1025 MIG is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 115C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +4 (+33%)1025 MIG16
Farmall 115C12
Median Utility Tractor12
1025 MIG is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 115C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
1025 MIG (A)Farmall 115C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 1025 MIG | Farmall 115C | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | D-242c | F5H | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 115hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 115C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 207ci | ▲ 1025 MIG+83 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 149in | ▲ 1025 MIG+17 in · +11% |
| Width | 78in | 83in | ▲ Farmall 115C+5 in · +6% |
| Height | 114in | 103in | ▲ 1025 MIG+11 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 9,469lb | 7,937lb | ▲ 1025 MIG+1,532 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4-Wheel Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | CaseIH Farmall 115C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,469 lb)B · 75th percentile (7,937 lb)
A · 1025 MIGB · Farmall 115CMedian Utility Tractor