Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1025 MIG
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1025 MIG vs McCormick Intl X50.50
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.50
Utility
- power
- 113 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 1025 MIG
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +2 hp (+2%)1025 MIG115 hp
X50.50113 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1025 MIG is in the 88th percentile; X50.50 is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +82 ci (+39%)1025 MIG290 ci
X50.50208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1025 MIG is in the 84th percentile; X50.50 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1025 MIG4
X50.504
Median Utility Tractor4
1025 MIG is in the 50th percentile; X50.50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +1,439 lb (+18%)1025 MIG9,469 lb
X50.508,030 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1025 MIG is in the 84th percentile; X50.50 is in the 76th · 5,107 models
1025 MIG (A)X50.50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 1025 MIG | X50.50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Perkins | — |
| Model | D-242c | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 113hp | ▲ 1025 MIG+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 208ci | ▲ 1025 MIG+82 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 164in | ▲ 1025 MIG+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 78in | 83in | ▲ X50.50+5 in · +6% |
| Height | 114in | 101in | ▲ 1025 MIG+13 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 9,469lb | 8,030lb | ▲ 1025 MIG+1,439 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 88th percentile (113 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,469 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 84th percentile (166 in)B · 82nd percentile (164 in)
A · 1025 MIGB · X50.50Median Utility Tractor