Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1025 MIG
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1025 MIG vs New Holland T6.145
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T6.145
Row Crop
- power
- 116 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
BelarusBelarus 1025 MIG
vs
New HollandNew Holland T6.145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T6.145 higher · +1 hp (<1%)1025 MIG115 hp
T6.145116 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1025 MIG is in the 88th percentile; T6.145 is in the 89th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1025 MIG higher · +16 ci (+6%)1025 MIG290 ci
T6.145274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1025 MIG is in the 84th percentile; T6.145 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1025 MIG4
T6.1454
Median Utility Tractor4
1025 MIG is in the 50th percentile; T6.145 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied1025 MIG16
T6.14516
Median Utility Tractor12
1025 MIG is in the 73rd percentile; T6.145 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
1025 MIG (A)T6.145 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1025 MIG | T6.145 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | FPT | — |
| Model | D-242c | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 116hp | ▲ T6.145+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 274ci | ▲ 1025 MIG+16 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ 1025 MIG+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5.2in | ▲ T6.145+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 179in | ▲ T6.145+13 in · +8% |
| Width | 78in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 114in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,469lb | 10,561lb | ▲ T6.145+1,092 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1025 MIG | New Holland T6.145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 89th percentile (116 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,469 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,561 lb)
A · 1025 MIGB · T6.145Median Utility Tractor