BelarusModel A
Belarus 1770
Utility
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- 558 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1770 vs CaseIH Puma 195
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 195
Row Crop
- power
- 195 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 1770
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 195
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Puma 195 higher · +10 hp (+5%)1770185 hp
Puma 195195 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1770 is in the 94th percentile; Puma 195 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1770 higher · +147 ci (+36%)1770558 ci
Puma 195411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1770 is in the 94th percentile; Puma 195 is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied17706
Puma 1956
Median Utility Tractor4
1770 is in the 93rd percentile; Puma 195 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1770 higher · +1,950 lb (+11%)177019,585 lb
Puma 19517,635 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1770 is in the 95th percentile; Puma 195 is in the 94th · 5,107 models
1770 (A)Puma 195 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 1770 | Puma 195 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CNH | — |
| Model | SMD-63 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 185hp | 195hp | ▲ Puma 195+10 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Puma 195+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 558ci | 411ci | ▲ 1770+147 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.1in | ▲ 1770+1 in · +24% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 195+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed four-speed power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 241in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 125in | 123in | ▲ 1770+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 19,585lb | 17,635lb | ▲ 1770+1,950 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | articulated hydraulic power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 23.1-26 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 23.1-26 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | articulated hydraulic power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 195 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (185 hp)B · 94th percentile (195 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (558 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (19,585 lb)B · 94th percentile (17,635 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 95th percentile (125 in)B · 95th percentile (123 in)
A · 1770B · Puma 195Median Utility Tractor