Image not recorded
Big BudModel A
Big Bud KT350
Utility
- power
- 350 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Big Bud KT350 vs Challenger MT740
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT740
Articulated
- power
- 345 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Big BudBig Bud KT350
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT740
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ KT350 higher · +5 hp (+1%)KT350350 hp
MT740345 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
KT350 is in the 98th percentile; MT740 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ KT350 higher · +256 ci (+43%)KT350855 ci
MT740599 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
KT350 is in the 98th percentile; MT740 is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT740 higher · +1 (+17%)KT3506
MT7407
Median Utility Tractor4
KT350 is in the 93rd percentile; MT740 is in the 98th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ KT350 higher · +4,110 lb (+11%)KT35040,000 lb
MT74035,890 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
KT350 is in the 99th percentile; MT740 is in the 98th · 5,107 models
KT350 (A)MT740 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Big Bud | Challenger | — |
| Model | KT350 | MT740 | — |
| Category | Utility | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 350hp | 345hp | ▲ KT350+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,700RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT740+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 855ci | 599ci | ▲ KT350+256 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ KT350+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ KT350+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | CVT, Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Operating Weight | 40,000lb | 35,890lb | ▲ KT350+4,110 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Load Sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Big Bud KT350 | Challenger MT740 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | 12 volt | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 98th percentile (350 hp)B · 97th percentile (345 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (855 ci)B · 95th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 99th percentile (40,000 lb)B · 98th percentile (35,890 lb)
A · KT350B · MT740Median Utility Tractor