Head to head · Sub-Compact

Carraro 3500 vs Challenger MT335

Image not recorded
CarraroModel A

Carraro 3500

Sub-Compact

power
31.6 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 3500 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT335

Sub-Compact

power
33 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT335 specs
CarraroCarraro 3500
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT335

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

▲ MT335 higher · +1.4 hp (+4%)
350031.6 hp
MT33533 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

3500 is in the 59th percentile; MT335 is in the 61st · 816 models

3500 (A)MT335 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCarraro 3500Challenger MT335Difference
ManufacturerCarraroChallenger—
Model3500MT335—
CategorySub-CompactSub-CompactSame

Engine

SpecCarraro 3500Challenger MT335Difference
ManufacturerCarraroMitsubishi—
Power Output31.6hp33hp▲ MT335+1.4 hp · +4%

Transmission

SpecCarraro 3500Challenger MT335Difference
TypeNot recordedManual—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCarraro 3500Challenger MT335Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WDNot recorded—
Drive Type2WDNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCarraro 3500Challenger MT335Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 59th percentile (31.6 hp)B · 61st percentile (33 hp)
A · 3500B · MT335Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageCarraro 3500Full spec pageChallenger MT335