Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 2594
Row Crop
- power
- 217 hp
- displacement
- 504 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 2594 vs CaseIH Puma 215
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 215
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH 2594
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 215
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 2594 higher · +2 hp (<1%)2594217 hp
Puma 215215 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
2594 is in the 81st percentile; Puma 215 is in the 80th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2594 higher · +93 ci (+23%)2594504 ci
Puma 215411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
2594 is in the 85th percentile; Puma 215 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied25946
Puma 2156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
2594 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 215 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 215 higher · +6 (+50%)259412
Puma 21518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
2594 is in the 27th percentile; Puma 215 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
2594 (A)Puma 215 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 2594 | Puma 215 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 217hp | 215hp | ▲ 2594+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Puma 215+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 504ci | 411ci | ▲ 2594+93 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.6in | 4.1in | ▲ 2594+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 215+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Three-speed power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 95.7in | 60in | ▲ 2594+35.7 in · +60% |
| Operating Weight | 16,220lb | 17,880lb | ▲ Puma 215+1,660 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear-Power Take-Off (PTO) | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 2594 | CaseIH Puma 215 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Silent Guardian cab with air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 81st percentile (217 hp)B · 80th percentile (215 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 85th percentile (504 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 71st percentile (16,220 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,880 lb)
A · 2594B · Puma 215Median Row Crop Tractor