Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 215
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 215 vs New Holland T7040
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7040
Row Crop
- power
- 214 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 215
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7040
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 215 higher · +1 hp (<1%)Puma 215215 hp
T7040214 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 215 is in the 80th percentile; T7040 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 215411 ci
T7040411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 215 is in the 60th percentile; T7040 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2156
T70406
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 215 is in the 50th percentile; T7040 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ T7040 higher · +1 (+6%)Puma 21518
T704019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 215 is in the 61st percentile; T7040 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
Puma 215 (A)T7040 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 215 | T7040 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | CNH Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 215hp | 214hp | ▲ Puma 215+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 190in | — |
| Width | 60in | 91.9in | ▲ T7040+31.9 in · +53% |
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,880lb | 17,760lb | ▲ Puma 215+120 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Direct engine drive hydraulic control system | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Category IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc hydraulically operated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 215 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 80th percentile (215 hp)B · 79th percentile (214 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 77th percentile (17,880 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,760 lb)
A · Puma 215B · T7040Median Row Crop Tractor