Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 210 vs CaseIH Puma 215

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 210

Row Crop

power
210 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 210 specs
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH Puma 215

Row Crop

power
215 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 215 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 215

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 215 higher · +5 hp (+2%)
Puma 210210 hp
Puma 215215 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; Puma 215 is in the 80th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 210411 ci
Puma 215411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; Puma 215 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2106
Puma 2156
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 215 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 21018
Puma 21518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 210 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 215 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Puma 210 (A)Puma 215 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelPuma 210Puma 215—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
ManufacturerCNHFPT—
Power Output210hp215hp▲ Puma 215+5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
WidthNot recorded60in—
Height120inNot recorded—
Operating Weight17,915lb17,880lb▲ Puma 210+35 lb · <1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
System TypePressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
Hitch TypeRear: II/IIIN2/3N—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3Not recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 210CaseIH Puma 215Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 80th percentile (215 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,880 lb)
A · Puma 210B · Puma 215Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 210Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 215