Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 275 vs CaseIH Farmall DX29
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX29
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 275
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX29
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 275 higher · +2 hp (+7%)27531 hp
Farmall DX2929 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
275 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 21st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 275 higher · +10.1 ci (+12%)27591.3 ci
Farmall DX2981.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
275 is in the 17th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2753
Farmall DX293
Median Utility Tractor4
275 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 275 higher · +126 lb (+5%)2752,600 lb
Farmall DX292,474 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
275 is in the 18th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 16th · 5,107 models
275 (A)Farmall DX29 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 275 | Farmall DX29 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 31hp | 29hp | ▲ 275+2 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ Farmall DX29+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.3ci | 81.2ci | ▲ 275+10.1 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 54in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 63in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,600lb | 2,474lb | ▲ 275+126 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Rear Type I | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 275 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 23rd percentile (31 hp)B · 21st percentile (29 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,600 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,474 lb)
A · 275B · Farmall DX29Median Utility Tractor