Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 3220 vs CaseIH CX50
CaseIHCaseIH 3220
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CX50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied322053 hp
CX5053 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
3220 is in the 48th percentile; CX50 is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3220 higher · +14 ci (+8%)3220179 ci
CX50165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3220 is in the 48th percentile; CX50 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied32203
CX503
Median Utility Tractor4
3220 is in the 23rd percentile; CX50 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied32208
CX508
Median Utility Tractor12
3220 is in the 23rd percentile; CX50 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
3220 (A)CX50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 3220 | CX50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | Perkins | — |
| Model | D179 | 903.27 | — |
| Power Output | 53hp | 53hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,180RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ CX50+70 RPM · +3% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 179ci | 165ci | ▲ 3220+14 ci · +8% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 5,617lb | 7,286lb | ▲ CX50+1,669 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Two-wheel drive (2WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 3220 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | 3.1gal | ▲ CX50+0.1 gal · +3% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (53 hp)B · 48th percentile (53 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 48th percentile (179 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 52nd percentile (5,617 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,286 lb)
A · 3220B · CX50Median Utility Tractor