Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 495 vs CaseIH CX50
CaseIHCaseIH 495
vs
CaseIHCaseIH CX50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied49553 hp
CX5053 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
495 is in the 48th percentile; CX50 is in the 48th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 495 higher · +14 ci (+8%)495179 ci
CX50165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
495 is in the 48th percentile; CX50 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4953
CX503
Median Utility Tractor4
495 is in the 23rd percentile; CX50 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied4958
CX508
Median Utility Tractor12
495 is in the 23rd percentile; CX50 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
495 (A)CX50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 495 | CX50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Perkins | — |
| Model | D-179 | 903.27 | — |
| Power Output | 53hp | 53hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ CX50+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 179ci | 165ci | ▲ 495+14 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.7in | ▲ 495+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 5in | ▲ 495+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially Synchronized | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 93.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,200lb | 7,286lb | ▲ CX50+2,086 lb · +40% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Two-wheel drive (2WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 495 | CaseIH CX50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | 3.1gal | ▲ CX50+0.1 gal · +3% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (53 hp)B · 48th percentile (53 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 48th percentile (179 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 49th percentile (5,200 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,286 lb)
A · 495B · CX50Median Utility Tractor