Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH 8940 Magnum vs CaseIH Puma 210

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 8940 Magnum

Row Crop

power
205 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full 8940 Magnum specs
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH Puma 210

Row Crop

power
210 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 210 specs
CaseIHCaseIH 8940 Magnum
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 210 higher · +5 hp (+2%)
8940 Magnum205 hp
Puma 210210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

8940 Magnum is in the 78th percentile; Puma 210 is in the 79th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8940 Magnum higher · +94 ci (+23%)
8940 Magnum505 ci
Puma 210411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

8940 Magnum is in the 87th percentile; Puma 210 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
8940 Magnum6
Puma 2106
Median Row Crop Tractor6

8940 Magnum is in the 50th percentile; Puma 210 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
8940 Magnum18
Puma 21018
Median Row Crop Tractor16

8940 Magnum is in the 61st percentile; Puma 210 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

8940 Magnum (A)Puma 210 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
Model8940 MagnumPuma 210—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
ManufacturerCDCCNH—
Power Output205hp210hp▲ Puma 210+5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement505ci411ci▲ 8940 Magnum+94 ci · +23%
Bore4.5in4.1in▲ 8940 Magnum+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.3in5.2in▲ 8940 Magnum+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
HeightNot recorded120in—
Operating Weight18,170lb17,915lb▲ 8940 Magnum+255 lb · +1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedPressure flow compensating (PFC)—
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
TypeIndependent with electro-hydraulic clutchNot recorded—
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedRear: II/IIIN—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity13,760lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeDifferential hydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
Coolant7.8galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH 8940 MagnumCaseIH Puma 210Difference
TypeCab with air-conditioningCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 78th percentile (205 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (18,170 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)
A · 8940 MagnumB · Puma 210Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 8940 MagnumFull spec pageCaseIH Puma 210