Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 210
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 210 vs New Holland T7040
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7040
Row Crop
- power
- 214 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7040
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7040 higher · +4 hp (+2%)Puma 210210 hp
T7040214 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 210 is in the 79th percentile; T7040 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 210411 ci
T7040411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 210 is in the 63rd percentile; T7040 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2106
T70406
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 210 is in the 50th percentile; T7040 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ T7040 higher · +1 (+6%)Puma 21018
T704019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 210 is in the 61st percentile; T7040 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
Puma 210 (A)T7040 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 210 | T7040 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | CNH Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 210hp | 214hp | ▲ T7040+4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 190in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91.9in | — |
| Height | 120in | 123in | ▲ T7040+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 17,915lb | 17,760lb | ▲ Puma 210+155 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Direct engine drive hydraulic control system | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear: II/IIIN | Category IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc hydraulically operated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland T7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 79th percentile (210 hp)B · 79th percentile (214 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,760 lb)
A · Puma 210B · T7040Median Row Crop Tractor