Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH 8950 vs CaseIH Puma 220

CaseIH 8950 Tractor
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 8950

Row Crop

power
225 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full 8950 specs
CaseIHCaseIH 8950
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 279–1,417

Engine Power

▲ 8950 higher · +5 hp (+2%)
8950225 hp
Puma 220220 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

8950 is in the 83rd percentile; Puma 220 is in the 82nd · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8950 higher · +94 ci (+23%)
8950505 ci
Puma 220411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

8950 is in the 87th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
89506
Puma 2206
Median Row Crop Tractor6

8950 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
895018
Puma 22018
Median Row Crop Tractor16

8950 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 220 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

8950 (A)Puma 220 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
Model8950Puma 220—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
ManufacturerCDCFPT—
Power Output225hp220hp▲ 8950+5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement505ci411ci▲ 8950+94 ci · +23%
Bore4.5in4.1in▲ 8950+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.3in5.2in▲ 8950+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
TypeFull Power Shift, Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutch18-speed full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
Operating Weight18,340lb15,900lb▲ 8950+2,440 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure-Flow CompensatedClosed center pressure flow compensating—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
TypeIndependent with Electro-Hydraulic Wet Disc ClutchNot recorded—
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
Hitch TypeIII/IIINII/IIIN—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity16,000lb28,660lb▲ Puma 220+12,660 lb · +79%

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
Chassis Type4x44x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeMFWD 4WD4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeDifferential Hydraulic Wet DiscNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
Control SystemNot recordedSelective Catalytic Reduction—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
Coolant7.8galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH 8950CaseIH Puma 220Difference
TypeCab with air-conditioningNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 83rd percentile (225 hp)B · 82nd percentile (220 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 79th percentile (18,340 lb)B · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)
A · 8950B · Puma 220Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 8950Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 220