CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 8950
Row Crop
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 8950 vs CaseIH Puma 230
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 230
Row Crop
- power
- 231 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 8950
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 230 higher · +6 hp (+3%)8950225 hp
Puma 230231 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8950 is in the 83rd percentile; Puma 230 is in the 84th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8950 higher · +94 ci (+23%)8950505 ci
Puma 230411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8950 is in the 87th percentile; Puma 230 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied89506
Puma 2306
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8950 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 230 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 230 higher · +1,460 lb (+8%)895018,340 lb
Puma 23019,800 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
8950 is in the 79th percentile; Puma 230 is in the 84th · 1,350 models
8950 (A)Puma 230 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 8950 | Puma 230 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 225hp | 231hp | ▲ Puma 230+6 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 411ci | ▲ 8950+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ 8950+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ 8950+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift, Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutch | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 18,340lb | 19,800lb | ▲ Puma 230+1,460 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with Electro-Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Rear Type: 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 8950 | CaseIH Puma 230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 83rd percentile (225 hp)B · 84th percentile (231 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 79th percentile (18,340 lb)B · 84th percentile (19,800 lb)
A · 8950B · Puma 230Median Row Crop Tractor