Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9170
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9170 vs Challenger MT765B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765B
Articulated
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 9170
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9170 higher · +14 hp (+4%)9170335 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9170 is in the 97th percentile; MT765B is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9170 higher · +318 ci (+59%)9170855 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9170 is in the 98th percentile; MT765B is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91706
MT765B6
Median Utility Tractor4
9170 is in the 93rd percentile; MT765B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT765B higher · +4 (+33%)917012
MT765B16
Median Utility Tractor12
9170 is in the 50th percentile; MT765B is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
9170 (A)MT765B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9170 | MT765B | — |
| Category | Utility | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 321hp | ▲ 9170+14 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 537ci | ▲ 9170+318 ci · +59% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 9170+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.9in | ▲ 9170+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | PowerShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 233in | ▲ 9170+47 in · +20% |
| Width | 164in | 88in | ▲ 9170+76 in · +86% |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 31,085lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed-center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Standard Cat.3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 17,263lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (12 volts) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT765B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (321 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (855 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Length
median 137 inA · 98th percentile (280 in)B · 96th percentile (233 in)
A · 9170B · MT765BMedian Utility Tractor