ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT765B
Articulated
- power
- 321 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT765B vs John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp
Crawler
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 549 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT765B
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT765B higher · +41 hp (+15%)MT765B321 hp
8330T 235 PTO hp280 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT765B is in the 10th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 3rd · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8330T 235 PTO hp higher · +12 ci (+2%)MT765B537 ci
8330T 235 PTO hp549 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT765B is in the 1st percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 4th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT765B6
8330T 235 PTO hp6
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT765B is in the 50th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT765B16
8330T 235 PTO hp16
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT765B is in the 50th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 50th · 59 models
MT765B (A)8330T 235 PTO hp (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT765B | 8330T 235 PTO hp | — |
| Category | Articulated | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | 2240 | — |
| Power Output | 321hp | 280hp | ▲ MT765B+41 hp · +15% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 549ci | ▲ 8330T 235 PTO hp+12 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | PowerShift | Powershift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 233in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 88in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 136in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,085lb | 27,060lb | ▲ MT765B+4,025 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center PFC | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Standard Cat.3/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 17,263lb | 15,199lb | ▲ MT765B+2,064 lb · +14% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | Track | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT765B | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 10th percentile (321 hp)B · 3rd percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 1st percentile (537 ci)B · 4th percentile (549 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 4th percentile (31,085 lb)B · 2nd percentile (27,060 lb)
A · MT765BB · 8330T 235 PTO hpMedian Articulated Tractor