CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9240
Utility
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9240 vs Challenger MT645B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645B
Agricultural
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9240
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9240235 hp
MT645B235 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9240 is in the 95th percentile; MT645B is in the 95th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9240 higher · +56 ci (+12%)9240505 ci
MT645B449 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9240 is in the 94th percentile; MT645B is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92406
MT645B6
Median Utility Tractor4
9240 is in the 93rd percentile; MT645B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9240 higher · +8,619 lb (+44%)924028,214 lb
MT645B19,595 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
9240 is in the 97th percentile; MT645B is in the 95th · 5,107 models
9240 (A)MT645B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9240 | MT645B | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Sisu | — |
| Model | CDC | 74ETA | — |
| Power Output | 235hp | 235hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 449ci | ▲ 9240+56 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 9240+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 250in | 206in | ▲ 9240+44 in · +21% |
| Width | 93.5in | 118in | ▲ MT645B+24.5 in · +26% |
| Height | 143in | 124in | ▲ 9240+19 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 28,214lb | 19,595lb | ▲ 9240+8,619 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Four-wheel hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 18.4-38 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4-38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III (Optional Rear Type) | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Four-wheel hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9240 | Challenger MT645B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.4gal | 8.9gal | ▲ MT645B+1.5 gal · +20% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (235 hp)B · 95th percentile (235 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (505 ci)B · 93rd percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (28,214 lb)B · 95th percentile (19,595 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 96th percentile (250 in)B · 95th percentile (206 in)
A · 9240B · MT645BMedian Utility Tractor